- "What is necessary in creating a productive and effective literacy curriculum is to consider that students need to be engaged in curriculum that is meaningful in their lives." (pg. 218)
This quote expresses an important over going theme in this book. Its constant presence is very reinforcing. The effectiveness of this is demonstrated in the opening vignette. Ms. Bell is able to engage her students in more active writing by allowing them to write about one of their favorite subjects.
- " In the early 1990's, researchers with a skills orientation noted that fluency was an important skill and that in order to determine fluent readers, timed reading tests were administered. Students who read fast on these test were touted as better readers than those who read more slowly or those who struggled to complete the test in the allotted time." (pg.227)
Questions:
- On page 232, It is discussed how written expression deals with a lot of creativity with words to compensate for the use of gestures and tones used in verbal expression to convey an idea. ELL student's might find difficulty in reading when encountering interesting vocabulary that is being used to describe something. An ELL can easily be labeled as having a reading disability if this isn't looked at beyond the surface. I wonder how carefully are these diagnoses being monitored in the classroom? How often are these student's being assessed? Are student's being encouraged enough to have confidence in admitting that their not familiar with a word?
- On page 231, it is discussed how turning to easier books can raise confidence and performance in readers who are struggling with their fluency. How often should a teacher monitor a students progress? Should a teacher present the student with a variety of books that are gradually reaching their grade level?
Issue:
In pg. 242, Critical practices are discussed. It shares an example of students doing individual research on the president of the U.S. They are instructed to jot down questions and comments about the material. I felt that this isn't enough. It is great to have individual opinions and being able to write them down, but I also think that it is important to teach our students to engage in expressing their ideas. Students should be taught and encouraged to conduct discussions with their classmates. They can continue to use their journals as guides of issues that students would like to further discuss and learn more about with their classmates This will not only allow students to become more critically aware of the text but it will also give the text more meaning. Students should learn to challenge ideas at a young age. In my education, I don't recall being encouraged to challenge ideas until I started high school and college. Students should start thinking outside the box sooner than never.
2 comments:
Your question regarding students' understanding of vocabulary can also include idioms that are found in the English language. The use of multiple assessments to check for understanding would be the most beneficial, especially if a student isn't comfortable admitting he or she does not understand something. Using Total physical response, TPR, to teach the student vocabulary is also helpful for the student to gain understanding and retain the meaning of the word.
Your issue focused on the limited use of interaction and cooperative learning. The assignment should have been used as a starting point or a smaller activity to get the students to organize their thoughts. The teacher then could have had partner sharing, small group discussions, or whole class participation in charting what the students discovered. The teacher also needed to look at the standards and objectives to see how they were being met through this activity. There are a variety of different directions that the teacher could have continued to have her class use this information. If it was to improve their skills in using reference materials, then the teacher also needed an informal and formal assessment incorporated into the end of the lesson.
Post a Comment